Students’ engagement and their academic performance in STEM and Non-STEM elementary schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71085/sss.04.02.264Keywords:
Academic performance, learning motivation, Student engagement, STEM education, non-STEM education, Teacher supportAbstract
Academic performance is connected to student engagement across different educational settings such as STEM versus non-STEM elementary schools. In this study, I explore the differences of student engagement and academic performance in STEM and non-STEM elementary schools. The study was a cross-sectional survey design using a quantitative approach. There was a population of 300 students made up of 300 students from non-STEM schools and 300 students from STEM schools. Extensive participation disparities across the two school types is highlighted by the study. The study finds students in STEM schools to be more motivated, class participative, which also results in having more interaction with teachers and peers, as well as better academic performance in general. Active, inquiry based teaching methods and incorporation of common modern technology in STEM settings are associated with these outcomes. On the other hand, non-STEM schools have lower engagement levels than STEM schools, specifically in peer collaboration and support from teachers. Consequently, the study concludes that non-STEM schools should adopt STEM pedagogies, develop their teaching infrastructure and present the curriculum reform, teacher training and the allocation of resources that ought to improve learning experiences in all educational contexts.
Downloads
References
Afzal, A., & Rafiq, S. (2022). Impact of Teachers' Instructional Techniques on Students' Involvement in Class: A Case Study. UMT Education Review, 5(2), 184-204.
Baker, D., Brown, P., & Williams, L. (2018). Parental education and student success: Analyzing socio-economic influences on learning outcomes. Education and Society, 25(2), 89-104.
Bertram, T. (2020). Creativity in primary education: The importance of arts and humanities. Educational Research and Review, 33, 10-19.
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings, 30(9), 1-18.
Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2017). Teacher and teaching effects on students' attitudes and behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 146-170.
Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2021). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 25(3), 35-49.
Bond, M. (2021). Schools and emergency remote education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A living rapid systematic review. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 191-247.
Bottia, M. C., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R. A., Moller, S., & Valentino, L. (2018). Growing the roots of STEM majors: Female math and science high school faculty and the participation of students in STEM. Economics of Education Review, 63, 1-18.
Carter, J., O'Sullivan, D., & Harper, T. (2023). Student engagement in elementary education: The role of social sciences in academic performance. International Journal of Early Childhood Education, 48(2), 67-84.
Chiu, M. M., Chow, B. W., & McBride, C. (2018). Students’ beliefs, engagement, and math achievement: A cross-cultural comparison across 41 countries. Learning and Instruction, 56, 22-34.
Cumming, S. (2019). Emotional engagement in the classroom: How non-cognitive factors shape learning outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 223-240.
Cumming, S. (2020). Emotional engagement in the arts: How creativity enhances learning outcomes in non-STEM classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 455-470.
Cumming, S., & Berwick, C. (2020). Emotional engagement and digital tools: Enhancing learning outcomes through technology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(1), 112-125.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
DeWitt, J., & Archer, L. (2015). Who aspires to a science career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2170-2192.
Duran, M., Ballone Duran, L., Haney, J., & Beltyukova, S. (2020). Project-based learning environments to improve STEM education: Theoretical foundations and practical implications. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14(2), 51-68.
Eccles, J. S., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. (2021). Expectancy-value theory of motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychologist, 56(2), 89-101.
Ewing, R. (2018). The role of the arts in the development of critical and creative thinking skills in primary education. Curriculum Perspectives, 38(2), 165-171.
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2022). Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2016). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M. T., & Schall Linn, J. (2019). Investigating the role of engagement in enhancing academic performance in secondary and post-secondary education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 801-818.
Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M.-T., Linn, J. S., Hofkens, T. L., & Sung, H. C. (2020). Using qualitative methods to develop a student engagement survey for upper elementary students. Learning and Instruction, 65, 101241.
Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M.-T., Schall Linn, J., & Sung, H. C. (2021). Engagement in STEM and non-STEM classrooms: Differences between classrooms in upper elementary grades. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 66, 101971.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2021). Active learning increases student performance in STEM: A meta-analysis of 225 studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(24), e2019089118.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2021). Active learning in STEM: Enhancing engagement and performance through interactive teaching. Journal of Engineering Education, 118(1), 40-60.
Furrer, C., Skinner, E., & Pitzer, J. (2014). The influence of teacher and peer relationships on students' classroom engagement and everyday resilience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 812-830.
Garcia, L., & Moreno, A. (2023). Gender and engagement in STEM education: Breaking stereotypes in early education. Gender and Education Studies, 29(3), 211-228.
Garvis, S., & Pendergast, D. (2017). Education reform in the context of STEM: Balancing priorities. International Journal of Educational Research, 84, 115-123.
Geisinger, B. N., & Raman, D. R. (2013). Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 914-925.
Girod, M., & Wong, M. (2021). Exploring the role of the humanities in STEM education. Educational Review, 73(3), 389-408. doi:10.1080/00131911.2020.1760781
Gonzalez, M., & Wilson, K. (2022). Teacher support and student engagement: Examining the role of instructional strategies in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 23-38.
Gutiérrez, K. D., & Jurow, A. S. (2016). Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 565-598.
Herro, D., Qian, M., & Jacques, L. A. (2017). Examining technology-enhanced learning environments in higher education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(3), 223-251.
Hsu, Y.-C., Lin, C.-H., & Ching, Y.-H. (2021). Applying augmented reality in K-12 classrooms: Engaging students in interactive learning environments. Computers & Education, 160, 104034.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2022). Supporting students' motivation and engagement through autonomy-enhancing instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 68, 102-130.
Johnson, S., Lee, H., & Martinez, P. (2019). STEM engagement and student motivation: A comparative study of elementary schools. Educational Research Quarterly, 44(4), 102-118.
Kamran, F., Afzal, A., & Rafiq, S. (2022). Teachers’ Behavior Influencing the Classroom Participation of University Students. Journal of Social Research Development, 3(2), 173- 192.
Kang, J., & Keinonen, T. (2021). The role of teacher support in student engagement in STEM: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Science Education, 43(2), 1-21.
Kiger, D., Herro, D., & Prunty, D. (2012). Examining the influence of a mobile learning intervention on third grade math achievement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 61-82.
Kim, J., McNair, S., & Harrell, M. (2020). Digital storytelling in elementary classrooms: Impacts on literacy and engagement. Computers & Education, 153, 103890.
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267-277.
Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2017). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 32-66.
Lee, C. (2021). Innovative curriculum design and student engagement: A study of STEM and non-STEM schools. Educational Review, 35(1), 55-72.
Lee, S., & Jung, H. (2023). Overcoming disengagement in STEM: Strategies for elementary educators. STEM Education Journal, 46(4), 45-60.
Lutz, S., Guthrie, J. T., & Davis, M. H. (2019). Emotional engagement in reading: Insights from student responses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 287-304.
Mahoney, J. L., & Vest, A. E. (2022). Extracurricular activity participation and longitudinal trajectories of academic performance. Developmental Psychology, 58(1), 126-137.
Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among US students. Science Education, 95(5), 877-907.
Mansour, N., & Wegerif, R. (2020). Dialogue, argumentation and emotion in education: Historical perspectives and contemporary directions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 1-8.
Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2017). STEM: Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in the national interest. Australian Council for Educational Research.
Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2019). Teacher-student relationships and students' engagement in high school: Does the number of negative and positive relationships with teacher’s matter? Educational Psychology, 39(2), 265-283.
McCulloch, A., Leggett, S., & Hicks, R. (2021). Balancing STEM and non-STEM education: Implications for academic and career readiness. Journal of Educational Policy and Practice, 12(3), 182-199.
Middleton, M., & Jansen, A. (2017). Motivation matters: How new research can help teachers boost student engagement. The Mathematics Teacher, 110(6), 442-448.
Miller, J., & Davis, B. (2021). Project-based learning and academic achievement: Evidence from STEM education. Teaching and Learning Research Journal, 30(2), 78-95.
Miller, K., & Kimmel, A. (2020). Addressing diversity in STEM: Overcoming barriers to student engagement and achievement. Science Education, 104(6), 1130-1150.
National Science Board. (2022). Science and Engineering Indicators 2022. National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/
NRC (National Research Council). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
Pitts, V. R. (2018). Barriers to early student engagement in STEM: Implications for future policy. Journal of Education Policy, 33(2), 154-165.
Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher-student relationships and engagement: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 345-387.
Rafiq, S., Afzal, A., & Kamran, F. (2022). Impact of School Environment on Students’ Academic Achievements at the University Level. VFAST Transactions on Education and Social Sciences 10(4), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v10i4.1216
Rafiq, S., Iqbal, S., & Afzal, A. (2024). The Impact of Digital Tools and Online Learning Platforms on Higher Education Learning Outcomes. Al-Mahdi Research Journal (MRJ), 5(4), 359-369.
Rafiq, S., Kamran, F., & Afzal, A. (2024). Assessing Environmental Awareness Integration in the Curriculum: A Case Study of Lahore's Private Schools. Al-Qudwah, 02(04), 86-100. https://al-qudwah.com/index.php/aqrj/article/view/36
Rafiq, S., Zaki, K. A, & Nawaz, A. (2025). Personalized Learning in the Digital Age: Harnessing Technology for Student Success. Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review, 3(1), 1515-1528. https://contemporaryjournal.com/index.php/14/article/view/475
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579-595.
Reeve, J. (2020). Understanding Motivation and Emotion (8th ed.). Wiley.
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Hulleman, C. S. (2021). SEL in elementary schools: Bridging student engagement and social-emotional learning. Handbook of Social and Emotional Learning, 311-330.
Robinson, K. (2020). Out of our minds: The power of being creative. Wiley.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2021). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students' school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 1-34.
Ruzek, E. A., Hafen, C. A., Allen, J. P., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Pianta, R. C. (2020). How teacher emotional support motivates students: The mediating roles of perceived autonomy and competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 119-130.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2021). Promoting engagement in non-STEM subjects: Self-determination theory and the arts. Journal of Creative Education, 4(1), 65-80.
Schmidt, A., Hardin, E., & Koul, R. (2015). A comparative analysis of student engagement in STEM and non-STEM subjects: Cognitive and emotional dimensions. Educational Researcher, 44(8), 455-463.
Schmidt, A., Hardin, E., & Koul, R. (2022). The intersection of cognitive and emotional engagement in literature studies. Journal of Learning and Cognition, 49(1), 22-34.
Sharma, R., & Kalra, N. (2023). The impact of early STEM engagement on future career prospects: A longitudinal study. Journal of Career Development, 50(3), 321-334.
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2016). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 131-145.
Shernoff, D. J., Sannino, G., & Tonks, S. (2021). Engagement in education: Reflections on past work and future directions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(1), 35-48.
Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1-13.
Sithole, A., Chiyaka, E. T., McCarthy, P., Mupinga, D. M., Bucklein, B. K., & Kibirige, J. (2017). Student attraction, persistence, and retention in STEM programs: Successes and continuing challenges. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 46-59.
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21-44). Springer.
Smith, R., & Brown, T. (2020). The impact of STEM education on student learning outcomes. Journal of Science and Education, 28(3), 67-82.
Stump, G. S., Hilpert, J. C., Husman, J., Chung, W. T., & Kim, W. (2019). Collaborative learning in STEM: The impact of student participation in cooperative learning environments on STEM engagement and performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(4), 601-623.
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 1-24.
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. (2017). Gender gap in STEM: Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119-140.
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2014). Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 137-143.
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2020). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy-value perspective to understand individual and gender differences. Developmental Review, 57, 100947.
Wang, M. T., & Holcombe, R. (2019). The impact of academic stress on the academic performance and well-being of high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 73, 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.03.002.
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in STEM: Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119-140.
Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2021). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23.
Wolters, C. A., & Taylor, D. J. (2020). A comprehensive review of strategies to promote STEM engagement among K-12 students. Journal of Science Education, 43(2), 13-21.
Zhao, P., & Xu, Z. (2023). Global trends in STEM education: Preparing students for the future workforce. Educational Policy Review, 59(2), 98-115.
Zhou, Y., Purushothaman, B., & Zeng, X. (2020). Impact of interactive learning technologies on student engagement: A case study in STEM education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(4), 527-540.
Zhu, C., & Zhang, H. (2021). The use of digital tools in non-STEM classrooms: A cross-disciplinary analysis of engagement outcomes. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 87-101.
Zhu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Using technology to enhance engagement in STEM: A meta-analysis of virtual tools in education. Computers & Education, 174, 104-209.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Syed Ali Ghawas , Dr. Farhat Munir, Dr. Laila Khalid (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.